top of page

The Art of Learning From What Worked — and What Didn’t

  • Writer: Nichole Martin
    Nichole Martin
  • 10 hours ago
  • 4 min read
ree

How leaders can create a culture where truth outranks rank.



Where Performance Cultures Break Down

Every organization talks about accountability. Few practice it well.

The third step in the G.R.E.A.T. Debrief™ model — Evaluate — is where accountability either strengthens a culture or fractures it. Fighter pilots know this step as the heart of performance improvement: a structured, blame-free analysis of what worked, what didn’t, and why.

It’s not about judgment. It’s about truth.

In high-stakes environments — whether in the skies, the ER, or the command post — the ability to evaluate with precision determines whether teams adapt or repeat their mistakes. The difference isn’t intelligence or experience. It’s culture.

Elite teams evaluate without ego. They remove rank, status, and emotion from the equation so that facts can lead the discussion. Executive leaders who build this habit unlock clarity, speed, and trust — the essential ingredients of performance under pressure.



The Fighter Pilot Standard: Rank-Off Honesty

In every mission debrief, the rule is simple: The rank comes off at the door.

When a squadron sits down to evaluate, hierarchy disappears. A junior pilot can correct a senior officer if the data proves them wrong — and it’s expected. The conversation revolves around performance, not position.

This “rank-off” honesty is the backbone of continuous improvement. It ensures that experience doesn’t become immunity from feedback and that authority doesn’t silence truth.

In executive environments, this principle translates directly. When team members believe that hierarchy outweighs honesty, information becomes filtered. Data is softened. Lessons are lost. Over time, the organization begins to perform to preserve comfort, not to pursue excellence.

Leaders set the tone. If the CEO or department head can admit a miss publicly, it signals that learning outranks pride. That one gesture can transform the entire feedback culture.



Why Evaluation Fails — and How to Fix It

Most organizations don’t lack evaluation tools. They lack evaluation courage.

The most common failure patterns are predictable:

  • Defensive posture: Team members explain outcomes instead of examining them.

  • Blame shifting: Individuals protect themselves instead of protecting the mission.

  • Surface analysis: Leaders settle for “what happened” and never ask “why.”

High-performing teams counter these with structure and discipline. Fighter pilots don’t ask, “What went wrong?” They ask, “What did we intend? What happened? Why did the variance occur? What will we do differently next time?”

That four-question loop is the essence of effective evaluation — factual, unemotional, and actionable.



The Executive Application: Evaluate the Process, Not the Person

Executives often operate in emotionally charged environments — mergers, crises, restructures, or high-visibility projects. The temptation to assign blame is strong, especially when performance gaps are public.

But blame blocks insight.

Effective evaluation shifts focus from who failed to what failed. This subtle distinction preserves accountability while maintaining dignity. It invites candor rather than concealment.

Practical Framework for Evaluation Conversations:

  1. State the Objective: Begin with the original mission or goal. Reconnect to intent before assessing execution.

  2. Describe the Outcome: Present data without emotion. Facts, not feelings.

  3. Analyze the Variance: Identify what caused the difference between intent and outcome.

  4. Extract the Lesson: Capture actionable takeaways for future missions.

When leaders use this structure consistently, teams begin to internalize it. Evaluation becomes second nature — not punishment, but performance refinement.



Lessons from the Cockpit

During my years as a squadron commander, I witnessed the power of structured evaluation. On one mission, a younger pilot made a tactical decision that deviated from the plan but produced better results.

In the debrief, we didn’t dismiss it because of rank or tradition. We studied it. Why did it work? Was it luck or judgment? Could it be replicated safely?

That discussion changed our tactics across the squadron.

The principle is simple: evaluate without ego. Great ideas can come from anywhere, and every mistake can teach something — but only if leaders make it safe to examine both.

The lesson applies universally. Whether you’re leading a flight team or a hospital network, the courage to examine outcomes objectively separates good from great.


Building the Culture: Normalize Honest Evaluation

To sustain a culture of truth over comfort, leaders must institutionalize it.

1. Create Rituals of Reflection. Schedule debriefs immediately after major initiatives. Make an evaluation routine, not reactive.

2. Protect Psychological Safety. Publicly thank those who raise difficult truths. Reward transparency the same way you reward performance.

3. Train for Objectivity. Coach leaders on how to ask probing questions without emotional bias. Objectivity is a learned discipline.

4. Close the Feedback Loop. Document findings and assign accountability for implementing changes. Evaluation without action is inertia.

When truth becomes a team habit, not a leadership demand, culture changes. People begin to self-correct faster because they know feedback is aimed at growth, not blame.


Evaluation and The Debrief Advantage™

The Evaluate step of the G.R.E.A.T. Debrief™ bridges reflection and action. It’s where performance becomes measurable and improvement becomes visible.

Without it, teams remain busy but not better. With it, they build precision — the defining characteristic of every high-performing unit, from fighter squadrons to hospital trauma teams.

For executive leaders, adopting a structured evaluation process means equipping the organization to learn faster than the environment changes. In volatile industries, that’s the ultimate competitive advantage.


Closing: Equip Your Leaders to Evaluate Like Fighter Pilots

When leaders create space for honest evaluation, they replace fear with focus. They build teams that own their performance, learn from failure, and adapt under pressure.

That’s the essence of The Debrief Advantage™ System — a framework that equips leaders in high-stakes environments to perform with clarity, courage, and continuous improvement.

Book Jeff “Bones” Bonner — The Debrief Expert™ — to keynote your next leadership conference or bring The Debrief Advantage™ System workshop to your executive team. Equip your leaders to evaluate with precision, communicate with confidence, and perform under pressure — just like the world’s top fighter pilots.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page